Early Romantic Guitar Sheet Period Technique

Early Romantic Guitar Period Technique

Dionisio Aguado Method

Method Books

There are many method books written in the 19th century, which provide first-hand insight into period technique. These original sources were written in various languages, depending on their origin.

The bibliography by Erik Stenstadvold "Guitar Methods 1760 - 1860" provides information on published methods of the time period, and it can be ordered through Amazon.com. For more info, please see: Pendragon Press.

Essay by Len Verrett

From the 19th c. Petersen Guitar School Summary: Musical interpretation is a field of study unto itself. Guitarists should seek out other musicians such as pianists or violinists who are well-acquainted with early 19th century compositions in order to learn how to properly interpret the music. Guitar music of the day closely followed writing and style of other orchestral instruments, and most the guitar's early composers started on other instruments, or played and wrote for multiple instruments. Guitarists should also seek out chamber ensembles such as guitar & flute / piano / violin, etc., and try to "fit in".

The lesson for today's performers who try to emulate "period" performance technique, is that "period" technique varied so much, that practically any technique in existence today has some historical basis, and it is best not to be dogmatic. Technique is a tool to achieve a particular musical effect, not an end unto itself.

The technique of Aguado is nearly identical to today's classical guitar technique, while Sor's technique seems to be borrowed more from the lute. I have often wondered if these two players did not have different roots: Aguado from the Baroque Guitar tradition, and Sor from the Lute tradition. Obviously, the strummed baroque guitar requires the right hand to be free, while the lute required the pinkie to be anchored to the top. Nearly every technique today, namely ima alternation, straight wrist playing, rasguado, rest stroke, nails or not, can be found dating back several centuries even before the 6-string guitar. Such techniques varied considerably by performer, country, time period, and style.


There is not a simple answer or a "silver bullet" to the question of interpretation. This is the area of "art" - much like the world of canvas paintings - where style and individuality are everything, and the question of which painting is "better" is purely subjective. However, music is a language, and like any language, there are rules of grammar and syntax for each language, and many stylistic dialects. Just like language, in music there are also accent patterns, and inflections, common phrases and expressions of "figures of speech" - and implied connotations that are understood by native speakers. The question is really, "What is the language of this style"? "How would it have sounded in those days?" To many, the answer is "I don't care, as long as it sounds good" - which is fine, since we are evaluating our taste in art. However, for those that want to tap into the deeper meaning by connecting to the finer points of musical connotation, an historically informed interpretational style is important. For example, while someone might think it sounds good to play Bach in the style of Tarrega - with heavy vibrato, rubato, portamentos, etc., others may cringe that it sounds "wrong" for that style - in the same way a native speaker may cringe at poor grammar. Or, think of an opera singer who sings blues or country & western music as notated, without any of the inflections that would be expected, and you get the idea. In the same way, some may like the revisionist attitude toward 19th century guitar repertoire, while others prefer a style that is consistent with how music of that period was typically played.

Learning to play effectively in a particular musical "dialect" takes years of study. Specialists can spend years refining interpretation to play Mozart properly, in accordance with Viennese stylistic musical customs and the time period, in the same way that playing Sor properly is a challenge. Shaving your fingernails and playing a period guitar will not make you sound like Fernando Sor. I have heard excellent interpretations on a variety of instruments, and conversely as well. Sor's style would have been much more the product of musical style, regardless of what instrument was used: in fact, Sor would have sounded like Sor whether he played piano or guitar - due to phrasing and style - although Sor does state in his method that guitar music has a particular resonance that would not sound right on a piano, for example.

I have conversed with many advanced and professional guitarists regarding how to interpret early 19th century guitar music. I have come to the conclusion that guitarists seeking to learn this style should seek out a pianist, violinist, flutist, conductor, etc., who is conversant with the "classical period" style. Many guitarists have tunnel-vision to the world of guitar, coming from the modern Segovia tradition of revisionism. Guitar music of the ERG period followed closely the orchestral instruments. In many period methods, including that of F. Sor, there are references to producing effects on the guitar to imitate flute, violin, brass, piano, drums, etc.. In any good master class or lesson with an expert in this style where an early 19th century guitar piece is analyzed, they will inevitably compare it to orchestral writing of the period. I cannot over-emphasize to guitarists the need to step outside of the guitar world to study with orchestral experts who truly understand the time period and style. Since technique apparently varied so widely in this time period, the important thing is to learn how to play in a style that is consistent with other instrumentalists and compositions of that period.

Right Hand Position

Adam Falckenhagen Baroque Lutenist Adam Falckenhagen
Pinkie on soundboard
The earliest 19th century guitarists used lute and baroque guitar technique. After all, the early guitar was simply a baroque guitar with an extra 6th string and single courses. Lute and baroque guitar players who play gut-strung romantic guitar today, using lute or baroque guitar technique, may come closest to approximating the original technique. One habit adopted from the lute was that of resting the pinkie on the soundboard. Most early 19th century guitars show considerable wear on the top where the finger rested. Many instruments have an oval-shaped finger rest on the top. Sor played lute-like, with no nails, and he forbids the use of the a (third anular) finger of the right hand for the melody, using only p,i,m. The a finger is used only for chords. The strings on the early flush-fingerboard guitars were extremely low to the top which faciliated the lute style of playing. Modern classical guitarists who play early 19th century guitars with flush fingerboards often find they must be careful not to scratch the top of the guitar with their nails because the strings are so low to the table. Later guitars with a raised fingerboard elevated this distance and thus the technique changed.

The "nails" and "no nails" debate often surfaces in classical guitar circles. It is well-known that Aguado used nails while Sor did not, for example. This debate also goes further back in time, several centuries, in various treatises, paintings and written accounts which show differences of opinion by performer, time period, and geography. The baroque guitarist Francesco Corbetta (1615-1681) used nails, as did many others.

Dionisio Aguado
Dionisio Aguado
With Tripodison
Over time, guitar technique changed. There is also evidence of different schools of thought on technique. Giuliani's music for example requires the use of the third right hand finger for melody, as Sor notes in his method. Other players, such as Sor's contemporary Aguado, advocated the use of the fingernails. The only strings in use were gut trebles, and typically wire-wound silk basses. These strings were more fragile, in the sense that rough or long fingernails would easily shred the gut strings. No-nail players of course did not have this problem. Nail players would have either used shorter, smooth nails to minimize the shredding, or perhaps just changed strings more often (or both). It is also possible that with thicker gauges of gut and lower tuning, and perhaps different string manufacturing methods using olive oil and other varnishes, the strings themselves may have been tougher.

It is often a misconception, repeated by 20th and 21st century sources who have no real first-hand facts, that Tarrega "invented" modern technique. In actuality, Aguado's ideas of using nails, not resting the pinkie on the top, using ima alternation, and probably the rest stroke, were passed on to Julian Arcas (Arcas studied with a student of Aguado). Julian Arcas was Tarrega's teacher, who passed along the already well-established technique of playing to Tarrega. The rest stroke is surely as old as the stringed instrument itself, and Richard Savino pointed out to me several primary sources from the ancient Renaissance and Baroque guitar repertoire that refer to rest-stroke techniques.

Another aspect of early playing that lutenist Ronn McFarlane shared with me is that of uneven articulation. Lute players usually alternate thumb-index (p-i). The thumb is stronger than the index finger, which gives a strong-weak alternating pulse to the music, rather than the consistent articulation often heard today. In early lute texts, the thumb is sometimes called the "good" finger and the index is called the "bad" finger. Sor strongly advocates p-i alternation in his method, whereas today's players are more likely to alternate i-m.

With the guitar being a new instrument, and with changes to the instrument over time such as the string distance from the top, the changing needs of the performer and so forth, it is not surprising that many players were self-taught, and that technique varied considerably between performers. Given the number of variables, it is nearly impossible to exactly replicate the style of playing and sound that would have been heard in the early 1800's. However, it is possible to be "historically informed" and temper one's technique and interpretation with a period style of playing. Even today, we find debate over the "Tarrega rules" with the bent right wrist, versus straight wrist technique.

The Instrument

I have found that the guitars themselves teach a lot about interpretation. There is a real difference between early French or Viennese guitars versus modern classicals in the attack, response, sustain, balance, timbre, scale, and so forth that can lend much insight into the music. The instrument is a "filter" through which music is processed, and the music can have a totally different effect with a different guitar. Since modern guitar technique is probably no different than Aguado's technique, I believe a true period sound can be obtained by playing a modern replica of a 19th century guitar, such as Panormo, Lacote, or Stauffer. I prefer the replicas because they have no mechanical problems due to age, they are accurately intoned, etc..

Left Hand Position

As with all aspects of period technique, the left-hand position varied between players. Sor advocated the modern method of keeping the thumb behind the neck for support, and he shows geometry-based arguments of why this is the strongest position, and why other styles of left-hand playing are "incorrect". Sor argued against using the thumb for bass notes. Sor's left-hand method is still used today.

Other players, like Mertz, Giuliani, and Carulli, sometimes used the thumb to finger bass notes on the 6th string. Facsimile editions indicate when the left-hand thumb is utilized, usually with the notation "pouce" or "^". Keep in mind that using the thumb was possible then since most early guitar necks were only 4.2-4.8 cm in width, versus the modern classical guitar 5.2 cm width. This technique was almost always used to finger the F# (6th string, 2nd fret) and hold it down. Most players today simply re-finger the piece to avoid using the left-hand thumb, but these passages can be awkward.

Playing Position

From the Carcassi Method

Gabriel Schebor's work: To see a true demonstration of playing according to Carcassi's technique, there is an excellent series by Gabriel Schebor on Youtube (search for "gschebor carcassi") performing Carcassi's Etudes on romantic guitar utilizing his method, as documented in the "Méthode... op.59" of 1836. As Gabriel explains: "Carcassi indicates clearly that the ring finger should be used only for 4-note arpeggios (where unavoidable) and 4-note chords. No nail playing, thumb always in "rest stroke" and the little finger resting on the soundboard. This approach shows similarity with Fernando Sor's technique and strongly resembles late Renaissance and Baroque lute technique."

Resting the little finger on the face of the guitar is frowned upon today in modern technique. Having attempted this myself, I found that in conjunction with having no nails, it changes the angle of the hand to produce a powerful and round-sounding stroke with the first two fingers, and it provides a secure point of reference to improve accuracy. It does, however, somewhat weaken the stroke of the third (ring) finger, possibly why both Carcassi and Sor advocated against using the third finger for melody, employing it only for chords and certain arpeggios. The thumb rest stroke is likely in order to provide a more powerful thumb stroke to pronounce the bass when playing without nails. The nails or no-nails debate has been discussed in depth over the years, and it remains a matter of personal preference and style. A variety of techniques can be employed to produce good music, and it is the musical end result that remains the most important factor.

A Carcassi portrait clearly shows the left-leg elevated position. However, the guitar rests against the chair somewhat, and Sor's method advocates resting part of the guitar body on a chair. It was also common to elevate the right leg, much like today's flamenco players. Aguado used a tripod device to mount the guitar, so that only the player's arms touched the instrument. The smaller 19th century guitar body affects how to hold the instrument, since the much larger modern classical puts the player's right arm in a different location. I find it is no problem to use the modern left-leg elevated position to play a period guitar; you simply lean forward slightly due to the smaller body size. It is also possible to put a small pillow underneath the instrument to elevate it.

Nearly every period guitar came with a strap button. In the early 19th century, classical guitarists often played using a strap. A period portrait of Giuliani depicts Giuliani playing the guitar standing up and wearing a strap; this is on the front cover of Dr. Heck's biography of Giuliani. Use caution with straps, however, since many period guitars show evidence of damage from being dropped, presumably when the strap came loose! The strap was also worn to help hold the guitar body in position, even while sitting. Another portrait of Schubert depicts the composer singing, and playing a Stauffer for accompanyment while standing and wearing a strap. Presumably, the standing position, much like today's popular guitars, is used for simple music because of the left hand limitations the standing position imposes.


Nearly all of the current "guitar tricks" in use today can be found in early 19th century guitar repertoire. The debate over who "invented" these techniques is something to be left to musicologists, but it is apparent that techniques like artificial harmonics, tambora, rasgueado, p-i-m-a alternation, tone color, articulation, pull-off's, muting, tremolo, and so forth were not invented by Tarrega, as they are found decades earlier in published repertoire. Further, it would be dubious to claim that Carulli or Sor invented these techniques, even if they could be traced as the earliest written reference to a certain trick. It is my belief that such techniques existed for centuries with earlier plucked stringed instruments, and were generally passed down through instruction or re-discovered each generation. Here are some specifics I have found:

  • Echo: The "echo" (sometimes "éco") technique means you must play only the fingers of the left hand and not play the string with the right hand. It's used when there is a legato between notes on different strings. There are many "éco" references in Carulli, for example in the op 16 (Rondo, allegretto) p.31 (Minkoff). It can also be when you play two or more notes as the same time without the right hand, like the e/g/d in the op 138 (p. 105 Minkoff line 2); it is why the second "echo" a/c/e is played with fingers 1/2/3 and not with the e on the chanterelle. Carulli writes "you must play the fingers of the left hand with energy on the strings, without pinching them". (From Louis-Marie Duvillard, France) A modern edition mentions that this technique is not effective with high tension strings on the modern guitar.
  • Spanish techniques: Carulli wrote several pieces in the Spanish style from around 1810-1820, in which many flamenco techniques are found (which undoubtedly existed centuries prior). In opus 138, circa 1820, Carulli has a page of technique explanations. Here we find a thumb sweep ("Pou" or "Pouce"), where the thumb strums the strings, as well as the "Ind" or "Index" finger sweep. It also refers to the "fris" technique, which is a form of rasgueado. Carulli writes (in French): "You have to close your right hand except the thumb and you open them one by one on all the strings" (but he does not specify if you open them from the index to the ring (or the little finger) or the from the little finger to the index like the modern rasgueado technique). (Translation from Louis-Marie Duvillard, France)
  • Tambora: Carulli's op. 138 also mentions the "Tamb" or "Tambour" technique, where you hit the thumb forcefully on the strings near the bridge.
  • Harmonics: there are 2 forms of harmonics - natural and artificial. Sor's method has a good chart of natural harmonic notes, and harmonics are commonly found in numerous works. Carulli's opus 113 (1819) uses the artificial harmonic technique as well: in the allegretto section, (page 4 of the facsimile, page 98 of Minkoff), there are some very high notes: a, c#, e. This occurs twice, so it is not a mistake. These notes would be at the 17th, 21st, 24th frets. Even Staufer has only 22 frets. It is possible to play the c# at 21st fret on a Staufer, but it is very awkward... The high e I can only play with a harmonic at the Chanterelle 1st string 5th fret (or try to guess where the 24th fret harmonic is, which I often miss), but it is awkward to find the 17th, 21st, and then 5th frets at the tempo indicated. With artificial harmonics, the solution is simple: a, c# and e were all harmonic - if so, your left hand stays at the 5th fret: a with artificial harmonic, 4th finger c# with artificial harmonic, and 5th fret top string open harmonic.
  • Glis or Glisee - Although deemed excessive by today's standards, this technique was an integral part of the style and was surely borrowed from the violin. It is found in Carulli's music from 1810-1820, and became very common after 1820 and is a common feature of Tarrega's music and into the early 20th century, and even in the music of Barrios. It is common in Carcassi's extended works, and is especially associated with the romantic period guitarists. Here, the finger quickly slides from the lower to the higher note, and maintains contact with the fingerboard during the slide. The entire motion takes place in about 1 second, but can vary in speed depending on the tempo of the piece and the desired effect.
  • Damped or Muted: A good example of this is found in Sor's op. 52. The right hand palm dampens the strings; this is similar to the pizzicato technique but was also mentioned as a way to copy the sound of the oboe.
  • Tremolo: While it is said that Tarrega was probably the first to compose an entire piece of music with the tremolo technique, this technique (which copies the mandolin) was found in earlier works by Regondi, Mertz, de Fossa, and others.


Most of the facsimile music has very few fingerings. Today's music is over-fingered. You will find however, that Studies and Exercises of the era were well-fingered, whereas the concert pieces were only fingered in particularly tricky passages. Often, a single fingering unlocks the key for fingering the entire passage. Sor's Method goes into great detail on fingering principles, and it was assumed that the player would choose them. I find that reasoning through the fingerings is a great tool to learning the piece. Invariably, modern edits of 19th century music have many poor choices of fingerings, or at least ones that do not conform to period practice. I have also found that too many fingerings slow down sight reading, as you have to process more information.

- Len Verrett

Essay by Makoto Tsuruta CRANE Home Page - Tokyo

Have you changed how you play, yet?

"I have seen (heard) many people playing 19th century guitars in front of me at occasions like concerts, instrument shows, and having visitors to my workshop. With few exceptions, most played the instruments with inappropriate touch. They tend to use strong apoyand and some even played with extremely long nails. How they play should be no problem on playing modern guitars or would even be praised by instructors, because those follow the modern guitar methods. The same methods are not directly applicable to 19th century guitars, unfortunately. Imagine what would happen when a modern guitar player tries to play a lute, a violin player tries a cello, or a piano player tries a cemballo? The same can be said for modern and 19th century guitars. Regrettably, even some professionals, who are praised as "first class player", play 19th century guitars with a modern guitar technique along with nail noise (don't imitate them). Conversely, some amateur players who play as hobby on Sundays can generate great sound with full volume on 19th century guitars. Put musical presentation and accuracy asides, it is the question of how good they are to create "best sound" of the instruments. This is a very important thing, even before talking about string tension and their material.

Without playing an instrument properly, it is not possible to evaluate and select strings for the instrument. If one is to play an instrument that sounds better with low tension, it should be played with an appropriate soft touch. When I pointed out this, many players replied that they were using "soft touch". However, they often used rough touch to me and generated noisy and uncertain sound without volume. Some could not change their touch appropriate to the instrument and used modern strings on a 19th century guitar claiming that high tension like modern ones had been used even at the period. I knew many example of damaged 19th century guitars using high tension strings to rationalize one's inability to adopt to the period instrument. Yes, there exists 19th century guitars that sounds better and produce volume when high tension strings are used. But, they are rare and sound more like modern guitars. I believe the instruments that sound better in lower tension posses the classical taste and the charm of 19th century guitar.

Many players can't stop basing on the previous instruments they have played when they face a different one. It's not easy to change the touch appropriate to a different instrument instantly. It should be basic to play different instruments differently, though. Like violin and cello or piano and cemballo, it often is better to play 19th century guitars and modern ones regarding them as completely different instruments. This is not only how you regard them conceptually but also changing how you actually use fingers and hands. When you have a chance to hear someone plays a 19th century guitar, please observe whether the player is trying to accomplish the same difference between playing cemballo and piano on the guitar or not. It does not matter how famous the player is or even an amateur player or not. Sometimes, beginners and steel string guitar players make better sound on 19th century guitars. If you encounter these "better sounding" players, you should learn how they play and try to imitate them.

I would like to emphasize this repeatedly. 19th century guitars are NOT the same instruments as modern guitars. Although they look alike, full benefit of the 19th century guitar can be obtained only when a player device to change how to play it. Being aware of this, the string selection for the instrument will be quite fruitful."

~ Some introductory remarks on

19th-century guitar performance practice ~

Part I - Technique

Rob MacKillop©


Most discussion among players of the modern classical guitar regarding the early 19th-century guitar has been backward looking, that is, either looking at ways of playing this repertoire on a modern instrument in a modern style, or how to imitate the stylistic features of the period on a modern guitar. I will focus instead on coming towards Sor and his contemporaries from before their period, as clearly each age either develops what has gone before or rejects it completely and strikes out in a new way. I will therefore delve into the roots of the style, uncovering the development of technique, instrument and repertoire. I will not consider the uses of this for the modern classical guitar, but will present instead (for better or worse) a more purist approach.


Two of the guitarists we know most about both happen to have been Spaniards, and both happened to have lived in the same hotel for a few years. They were good friends who supported each other’s efforts and even composed music for each other to play. Despite this, they had radically different approaches both to technique and to music itself. Their names are Fernando Sor and Dionisio Aguado.


Sor’s technique is very interesting. He discusses it in his ‘Méthode pour la Guitare’ – published in Paris in 1830, when Sor was 52 years old. It was published in an English translation two years later as the ‘Method for the Spanish Guitar’.


It is difficult to discuss Sor’s technique without first mentioning its relationship with harmony. Indeed, harmony is fundamental to Sor’s approach to guitar playing. He mentions it often in his Méthode:


“…I merely indicate the route which I have followed in order to produce results from the guitar which have obtained for me the approbation of harmonists, people the most difficult to satisfy and to dazzle in regard to music.”[i]


“…I found myself in a position to see a figured base, and, without taking up the guitar, to indicate the harmonic progression by the configurations alone.”[ii]


“I love music, I feel it: the study of harmony and counterpoint having familiarised me with the progression and nature of chords and their inversions.”[iii]


 “…the entire key to the mastery of the guitar (as an instrument of harmony) consists in the knowledge of the thirds and sixths.”[iv]


“…I almost always make the fingering which I employ for melody depend on that which I use for harmony.”[v]


“A guitarist who is a harmonist, will always have an advantage over one who is not.”[vi]


So Sor was proficient in reading figured bass, in other words he was able to improvise within the stylistic parameters common to his day. I shall talk much more about this improvisational aspect in the second part of this introductory essay, suffice for the moment to say that figured-bass reading clearly survived from the baroque era into the early and mid classical periods. There are examples of figured bass in the Georgina Gregory guitar manuscript from Edinburgh, c.1835. At the other end of the scale, we might say, Beethoven[vii] spent many of his formative years playing from a figured bass. C.P.E Bach mentions[viii] how modern players – i.e. the new post-baroque players – had to adapt their style somewhat:


“Our present taste has brought about an entirely new use of harmony. Our melodies, embellishments, and manner of performance often call for unusual chords. At times they must be played in few parts, again, in many. Thus, the range of the accompanist’s duties has greatly increased and the recognised rules of thorough bass, which must often be modified, are no longer sufficient.”


Sor was clearly in accord with Bach’s sentiments. He indicates obliquely that his accompaniment style – the only way he played the guitar in his formative years – was quite advanced:


“At first I took up this instrument merely as an instrument of accompaniment; but, from the early age of sixteen years, I was shocked to hear it said by those who professed to have but little talent, ‘I only play to accompany’. I new that a good accompaniment supposes in the first place a good base, chords adapted to it, and movements as much as possible approximating those of an orchestral score or those of the pianoforte; things which, in my opinion, afforded a much greater proof of mastery on the instrument than all those sonatas which I heard with long violin passages, without harmony or even devoid of base, excepting the base found on the open strings”


Sor is here referring to what we might call the early Italian classical guitar style, which has been argued by Thomas Heck, James Tyler and others, as indeed having developed from violinists who also played the guitar, and who naturally wrote their guitar music in the same treble clef that they used for notating their violin music – which is why we still use the treble clef for guitar notation today. But that is another story.

In a footnote to Sor’s discussion of harmony, he makes reference to Federico Moretti as being the only other guitarist he knew who had developed a harmonic approach to the guitar, as opposed to a melodic approach. Moretti’s first book, Principj per la Chitarra – (Principles of the Guitar) of 1792, was reprinted almost exactly as written in 1799 – when Sor was 21 years of age – but adapted for the 6-course, double-strung guitar “because this is the instrument generally played in Spain”. It is, by the way, entirely likely that both Sor and Aguado played the 6-course double-strung guitar in the early part of their careers.

I am awaiting delivery of the Spanish version of Moretti’s book, and must in the meantime work from the Italian version. After naming the notes, showing where they are to be found and providing exercises in scales of unisons and octaves, Moretti moves quickly on to chords. He provides four versions – in different positions – of each of the major and minor chords, and also sevenths and diminished chords. Then he demonstrates a number of cadences – I IV V I – in major and minor keys, showing good voice leading, using inversions as well as root positions. This all helps to develop a sense of key – the foundation of tonal music. Finally he moves on to examples of arpeggios with indications for right-hand fingering, and it is here that we find many interesting correlations to the right-hand techniques of Sor and Aguado.

Moretti never uses the annular finger. Consider arpeggio No.24: It is a rising four-note arpeggio of a basic C major chord. It is fingered thumb, index, middle, middle. No modern player would consider such a technique. Now consider No.37. Here the three bass notes are all played with the thumb. The first string is plucked by the middle finger, and the index finger plays both the second and third strings consecutively. This last technique of raking the index finger over two strings is mentioned in Aguado’s ‘New Guitar Method’ of 1843, but in the context of playing thirds:

            “The forefinger can also pluck the first and second strings when they have to be sounded together.”[ix]

The technique was a common lute technique in both the Renaissance and Baroque periods for the playing of chords of more than three notes. The influence of the techniques from these periods can be more clearly seen in Sor.


Sor regarded his own technique as being different from that generally found. He seems to have had more in common with lute technique than what we might call the more modern technique advanced by Aguado and others. He is careful to point out that his technique is derived from the music:


“…I shall never say to the reader – This is what is necessary to be done – but – this is what I found necessary to do…”[x]


On page 20 of his Method, he makes a statement which draws him right back into Renaissance lute technique:


“This fingering has for its object, not only to economise as much as possible the number of fingers, but to make my operation conduce to the expression of the musical accent.


…and on page 22 mentions never plucking:


“…on unaccented times of the measure, reserving the thumb for the accented notes.”


And, finally (on page 33), the choice of finger depends on the accent:


            “I observe whether the musical accent be on the highest or lowest (string).”


These last three quotations are extremely important. In Renaissance lute technique, generally the only right-hand indication is for the index finger, which is reserved for the weak beats. This is an extension of the Renaissance philosophical theory that Man is ‘at one’ with the universe, at least in the dimensions of his body (think of Michelangelo’s drawing of Man with legs and arms outstretched, surrounded by a circle representing the heavenly bodies). There is a natural inequality in strength in the fingers of the hand. The thumb is heavier than the index, and when playing a lute has the added weight of gravity to increase its power. The middle finger is longer than the index finger and is therefore also stronger. Therefore the natural inequality of the hand can match the inequalities of stress within a musical bar. Therefore Man and Nature (represented by musical sounds) are as ‘one’.


This technique was perfect for the early Renaissance lute but was less useful on the larger 13-course Baroque lutes, where the thumb is often stretched far away from the index finger, and, quite frankly, one is happy to just play the notes with the nearest available finger. Because of these technical difficulties, Baroque players developed the use of slurs, wherein the second note is somewhat quieter than the first, thereby reproducing the inequality of stress. Slurs are essential to Sor’s technique (page 21):


“As to the right hand, I have never aimed to play scales staccato, or detached, nor with great rapidity, because I have been of (the) opinion that I could never make the guitar perform violin passages satisfactorily, while, by taking advantage of the facility which it offers for connecting or slurring the sounds, I could imitate somewhat better the passages of an air or melody. For this reason, I play only the note which commences every group composing the passage.”


Unlike Moretti, Sor did employ the use of the annular finger, but very sparingly:


“I therefore establish as a rule of fingering, for the right hand, to employ commonly only three fingers [pim]…and to use the fourth [a] only for playing a chord in four parts…”[xi]


He clearly considered the annular finger as being quite weak and not to be exposed (page 33):


“…if I rarely use the third finger of the right hand for harmony (i.e. arpeggios and chords), I forbid it entirely for melody.”


Sor also mentions placing the pinkie on the soundboard of the guitar. It is not something he does constantly, but finds it a useful technique in certain passages when the thumb approaches the second and first strings. This is clearly derived from lute and baroque guitar technique, and is referred to also by Aguado in his New Guitar Method:


“Some rest the little finger of the right hand on the soundboard so as to give sureness to the hand when plucking. This may have been useful while the guitar was not in a fixed position, but now that it is played on a tripod I do not consider the support necessary because the fingers of the right hand depend on the support given by the forearm and wrist”


Aguado is here referring to his patented tripod, designed to hold the guitar still and away from the body, thereby increasing volume and resonance. Presumably, if the tripod invented and sold by Aguado was not available, the pinkie support would be deemed ‘necessary’. Giulio Regondi is another player who utilised this technique. It is a technique which is usually viewed with horror by present-day classical guitar teachers, as it can restrict the action of the annular finger. Having played the lute with just such a technique for the past ten years, I feel quite comfortable with it. The touch on the soundboard is very light and frequently rises off the soundboard altogether. As both lute technique and Sor’s guitar technique avoid as much as possible the use of the annular finger, it is not problematic and, indeed, can help relax the muscles of the hand.


Reading between the lines, it is clear that Sor found alternating the index and middle fingers at high speeds quite difficult without employing slurs. In his Method, he even admits to having re-written a passage for guitar in Hummel’s Sentinelle, because it was too difficult. The passage in question was actually written by Giuliani and is in the fast violin-style of mainly single notes. The great master of this style of playing was Aguado. In Les Deux Amis, a duet written by Sor for he and Aguado to play, Sor included a fast variation for Aguado to play:


“Only the part of Mr Aguado has a very rapid variation, but it is in single notes and in the style most known” (my italics).


Aguado published 3 ‘methods’: 1) Escuela de Guitarra (Madrid, 1825) 2) Nouvelle Méthode de Guitarre, Op.6 (Paris, 1834), and 3) Nuevo Método para Guitarra (Madrid, 1843). I have only studied this last one as it is the only version to have been translated into English (Tecla Editions).


Setting aside Aguado’s use of the tripod, I shall concentrate on his right-hand technique. Unlike Sor, Aguado employed a nail technique. He is very careful to describe exactly how the finger strikes the string:


“…it must be understood that the strings are not plucked only with the nails, because the sound would not then be very agreeable. The string is first played with the fingertip using the part nearest the thumb, the finger slightly extended (not bent as for plucking with the fingertip only), and then the string is immediately slid along the nail...If the nails are used, runs can be performed very rapidly and clearly. There is an important exception, however. Persons with very long fingers should not play with the nails, because this gives each finger more leverage on the strings and thus diminishes the force used.”


His description of the string sliding along the nail sounds very contemporary and is fairly indistinguishable from the technique used by almost all professional classical guitarists today. As this tutor from 1843 is the first time it is mentioned, and as this same tutor was used by Tárrega, Segovia, Bream, Williams and other giants of the modern classical guitar, it is fair to say that Aguado’s Nuevo Método is the starting place for modern guitar playing. But I am in danger here of doing what I said I would avoid doing at the start of this essay – looking backwards to see what can be used today on the modern guitar. Aguado’s Nuevo Método has much more of interest to the student of early performance practice on period instruments. Not least in the area of improvisation, which I shall turn to in Part II.


Rob MacKillop ©2003


[i] Fernando Sor, Method for the Spanish Guitar (Tecla 1995, p.5).

[ii] Idem. p.6.

[iii] Idem. p.5.

[iv] Idem. p.28.

[v] Idem. p.28.

[vi] Idem. p.42

[vii] David Wyn Jones, The Life of Beethoven. Cambridge University Press, 1998.

[viii] C.P.E Bach, Essay on the True Art of Playing Keyboard Instruments (1762). Translated and edited by William J.Mitchell. Cassell and Company, 1949. p.174.

[ix] Dionisio Aguado. Nuevo Método para Guitarra (Madrid, 1843). Quoted from, ‘New Guitar Method’ published in English by Tecla, 1981 and 1995.

[x] Idem. p.7.

[xi] Idem. p.11.

Note: If you would like a copy of Rob MacKillop's second article in this series titled "~ Some introductory remarks on 19th-century guitar performance practice ~ Part II - Improvisation" - please write to me and I will email you a copy. It has many graphical examples and is too large to fit on this web page.

Top of Page

Early Romantic Guitar Home Page

The editor especially welcomes comments and ideas for this web site.
Please send an email to Len if you would like to contribute text, links, photos or information.

Primary Email Contact: Mail@EarlyRomanticGuitar.com Mail@EarlyRomanticGuitar.com